Author

# [THE INERRANCY OF THE BIBLE](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2020/05/15/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible/)

[May 15, 2020](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2020/05/15/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible/) [Christian Publishing House](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/author/christianpublishers/)

“As the Bible is firmly rooted in the God whose Word it is, each member of the Trinity is involved in its inerrancy. Thus, three arguments can be stated, one in terms of each member of the Godhead. That the Bible is without error is clear from these three arguments.” – Norman L. Geisler

[Continue reading](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2020/05/15/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible/) … [https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2020/05/15/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible/](https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2020/05/15/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible/)

“As the Bible is firmly rooted in the God whose Word it is, each member of the Trinity is involved in its inerrancy. Thus, three arguments can be stated, one in terms of each member of the Go…

Discussion

10 comments

  1. Kubowaki Julia says:

    i hope that a lot of people who do not believe in the Trinity will read ,this wonderful information

  2. Mashwene Lazarus Matlala says:

    Amen

  3. John Delmore says:

    This is useless in convincing anyone who doesn’t already believe. It’s nothing but crude circular reasoning.

  4. Budy Harianto says:

    Apologetic in its basic sense is persuasion right?.. long lonely winding road…right?..
    Not a picture of Napoleon on trampling down bodies with that head high….?

  5. Pierre Desjardin says:

    The Christian publishing house instructing us how to verify the inerrancy of the bible and its characters by using the bible.??‍♂️ This is as circular reasoning as it gets. Completely bias.

  6. Mark Jones says:

    Reading this critically, it’s not the best way to put across the scriptures being inerrant or infallible. The best out of the three arguments is the first, the second and third ones are quite flimsy to be honest.

  7. Jack Johnston says:

    Doesn’t Geisler see that his whole argument is deductive nonsense. It is formally correct, but it has no basis in reality.

    How about this. Since the Bible is imperfect reflecting its author, then God as the author is imperfect.

    At least that has some actual evidence demonstrating the imperfections of the Bible as the primary premise being true.

  8. Jack Johnston says:

    When a guy makes his living apologizing for a book, you’ve got to wonder if he might have a conflict of interest in promoting sugar and spice estimations of the Bible when the reality is the Bible is bitterness and vinegar.

  9. […] “As the Bible is firmly rooted in the God whose… […]