Author

I wanted to share a dispute against baptism that I have heard, and my findings on that argument.

Argument is found in Acts 2:38

There is division amongst the Denominational Church over a single preposition word “Eis/for”. Today some commentators will use this Greek word to justify it as baptism is not neccesary (Eis/for) the forgiveness of sins, because the context of this word “eis” (COULD) refer to “on account of.” However, they will not go any deeper than that from the different commentating Bible that I have had.

Example:
1.) Eis/For (To obtain) ARGUMENT FOR BAPTISM BEING NECESSARY FOR REMISSION OF SINS
Go to the store [for/to obtain] groceries

2.) Eis/ For (On account of) ARGUMENT FOR BAPTISM NOT BEING NECESSARY FOR REMISSION OF SINS
He went to prison [on account of/ for] false testimony

The slight change of the use of the word “for” completely changes the tone of the passage. Is this a command or a suggestion? Is baptism necessary or not? However, reading the context it is clear

(for/gar-γάρ) this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out (for/peri-περί) many (for/eis-εἰς) forgiveness of sins.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭26:28‬ ‭NASB‬‬

1- Whether you believe faith alone gives you salvation or baptism to obtain forgiveness of sins, both parties believe that salvation through Jesus Christ comes available to us after the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. Jesus himself says it in this passage as he is moments away from his fate of death. We are absolutely saved through the death, burial and resurrection of Christ. Salvation comes through a sacrifice of a lamb without blemish, and Jesus was that perfect lamb.

2- Jesus was not stating that this was his blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many on (account of) we have already recieved forgiveness of sins. Jesus has not even shed or even sweat blood at this moment.

3- The definitions of each “for” mentioned in Matthew 26:28

*(gar-γάρ)- is properly a particle of affirmation and conclusion, denoting truly therefore, verily as the case stands, “the thing is first affirmed by the particle γέ, and then is referred to what precedes by the force of the particle ἄρα”
*(peri-περί)- about concerning, as respects, on account of, through
*(eis-εἰς)- into, to, toward, for, among, thenceforth, for the benefit, to the advantage of, to obtain

If you have any questions or want to do a bible study you can hit me up.

Discussion

4 comments

  1. Nathaniel Taylor says:

    The bottom line is all of orthodoxy from the very earliest records of the church until AD 1500+ affirm baptismal regeneration when directly speaking of baptism. There’s not a single person that either Catholics or Protestants would seem a church father before Huldrych Zwingli in the 1530’s made the determination that it wasn’t necessary for salvation and brought Calvin along with him. Zwinglian concepts on baptism are new and a deviation from 1500 years of orthodoxy. But then this guy reinterprets Acts 2:38, John 3:5, Titus 3:5, Matt 28:19-20, Mark 16:15-16, 1 Cor 6:11, and 1 Peter 3… and everyone acts as if it’s an orthodox position. Luther specifically affirmed that baptism was not a work. Don’t be fooled by Zwingli. He preached another gospel.

  2. Johny Goodwin says:

    We do see nt examples of people not being baptised, the guy on the cross obviously didn’t, in writing to the Corinthians paul makes mention of believers being baptised vicariously ‘for the dead’, so Christians being saved and then dying or being killed before having the opportunity to fulfill the obligation, I say obligation because in acts 2 Peter is simply following the teaching of The Lord who said ‘whoever believes and is baptised shall be saved’, so in conclusion I would say that baptism doesn’t save you, but it is the first step in making an outward profession of what Christ has done for us,in openly denouncing the flesh and the need to be born again, He said it, therefore we should do it.

  3. Anil George says:

    Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.
    2 Timothy 2:15, ESV

    The book of Acts is a transitional book. Acts 2:38 was Peter’s response to the Jews (Men of Israel) for their question, … what shall we do? The Gospel didn’t reach the Gentiles (that’s non-Jews) until Acts 10.

    BAPTISM..DOES..NOT..SAVE

    For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
    Ephesians 2:8‭-‬9 ESV

  4. Bob McKay says:

    Peter was speaking to Israel. about their disobedience to their covenant program., Who included divers washings and baptisms to be right with Jehovah.Heb.9:10. Heb.6:2.
    Gentiles are not under that covenant, but obey our Apostle ,Paul, the Apostle to the gentiles.