How can human evolution be classified as scientific when it cannot be tested, proven, verified or observed?
Discussion
16 comments
-
I don’t see how anyone can call it anything else but religion.
It takes a lot of faith to believe in something that does not naturally occur.
It takes more dumb blind faith following to believe in something that does not naturally occur but believes and argues it naturally occurs. -
I think it’s the same thing as a religion, atheism is just another belief system.
-
Archeology is, I’d guess, meant to be testing and observing. It also reveals the lack of missing links.
-
Take it as it is presented. It won’t change your life a bit.
-
Same as creation
-
Gullible.
-
The second law of thermodynamics known as entropy makes it impossible for evolution to happen, devolution is only possible.
-
Human evolution is a fraud.
-
It’s a mere philosophy??
-
Exactly right it is only a wild guess there is no proof or even evidence to it.
-
There is a difference between theory and fact, it is a theory of science, and thus, inherits the name scientific.
-
What’s your scientific evaluation or definition of human evolution? The time frame/s you are referring to?
-
As opposed to believing in the invisible man in the sky?
-
Honestly, because this is the absolute most expensive mistake in human history. Every text book is wrong. The amount of money spent on reasearch. It’s all wasted. Just imagine how much money it will cost to fix this error. That’s why they claim.its science when in fact science has proven IT WRONG!!! It would bankrupt universities, labs, publishers. Correcting this one will be the most expensive undertaking in human history. So they will push this down the road for as long as they possibly can.
-
So, there are two kinds of science. Observational science and historical science. Both creationists and evolutionists look at the same data and look through different lenses to arrive at their conclusions. These separate theories are based in the past, historical science, and are not observable. However, the facts most closely align with creationism and many, many things are evolution killers, disproving Macroevolution as invalid. Remember, microevolution, or variation is factual and Biblical. Fixity of species is unBiblical and not factual. Everything varies within its kind, dog kind, cat kind, sauropod kind, etc.
-
[…] How can human evolution be classified as scientific when it… […]
Comments