God “could” exist
God doesn’t = existing for your pleasure
Therefore, God could give unpleasant commands
With this being said, should we give special treatment to some people who believe in a God?
“You can act on your Gods commands but not you guys in the back”?
Either we treat all religions the same, “don’t act on your God’s commands”, or we give special treatment to some.
Do you agree?
What is special treatment?
agree.
How much certainty do you have that God does not exist, and on what basis?
How is “God could give unpleasant commands” a logical conclusion from god’s [supposed] inexistence, and existence for my pleasure?
God, God’s Which Is It pleasure?
If God doesn’t exist then what is pleasure? Who cares what pleasure is anyway and why should anything you say matter? *that feeling when atheists don’t like to take their Godlessness to deep nihilistic levels*
I still don’t get this. Are you suggesting we should treat believers and non-believers differently?
Couldn’t follow your argument or question or statement. Please rephrase.. not to sure what you’re trying to say
Sorry, reread your post and still haven’t a clue ….try posting when you’re sober.
Jesus said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. NO ONE comes to the Father except that they go through ME.”
No, all religions are not the same. You do not get pure gold by diluting it with other things.
Do I agree? I am not sure what you are trying to even say.
Are you sane? Or are you just drunk? Your statement does not make any sense.
[…] God “could” exist God doesn’t = existing for your pleasure… […]
Comments