Author

Do you guys think falsifiability is important?

Discussion

7 comments

  1. Jeffrey Sanate Hmar says:

    For what?

  2. Amateshe Godfrey says:

    Why not

  3. Harvey Ward says:

    Popper did

  4. John Maya Sr. says:

    Is it possible for some things to be properly basic knowledge? Things we “just know?” Without being able to falsify or demonstrate how it is we know?

  5. John Maya Sr. says:

    Can “So you can know if your beliefs are true” be falsified? Gödel incompleteness already says we can’t know anything with certainty. Even math and logic rest on unprovable axioms.

    Seems unless we are omniscient we’ll just have to settle with “I believe.”

  6. Olivaire Watler says:

    I think that is more for scientific epistemology.

  7. Randy Steinke says:

    Has more to do with the Character of the Inquirer. Falsifiability has to do with the person’s willingness to change their views IMO