Author

I am saddened that I have to write this post. In the past few days scrolling through the comments on many a post, I have noticed a disturbing trend. Some of the comments that are meant as an argument or a defense of their beliefs are nothing more then a one word answer, in fact I saw one this morning that was just “bull” on a post. These comments produce no sort of proof, or defense of your beliefs to anyone involved. If you see someone that you believe is lost in a false doctrine, then it should break your heart, it should cause you to provide a defense from Scripture, a defense of the truth, that answers them point to point, if all Paul, Apollos, and the early Christians did was say “bull” when someone debated against Christianity, how many people wpuld they have won to Christ? Or when the Spirit of God fell on the Church in Acts 2, and some accused them of being drunk, if they just said “not true” how many people that day would have been added to the Church? The Bible records a defense given by Peter, and after his defense 3,000 people came to know Jesus. This is the goal of apologetics, it is not to win an argument, it is not to gain glory for ourselves, it’s not even to look smart, but it is to win someone to Jesus.

but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect,
1 Peter 3:15

Discussion

21 comments

  1. Stuart Moffatt says:

    Aim to win the person, not the argument.

  2. Menuoneizo Mepfuo says:

    I see lots of “catholic bashing” in this page. Sure, some of their beliefs and practices may be not Biblical but as for me I won’t and I can’t label more than 1 billion Catholics around the world as cults or heretics. There are some pretty messed up people in evangelical Christians and other denominations too

  3. Mark Jones says:

    I haven’t noticed this trend particularly to be honest. But it wouldn’t be a surprise if that was the case.

    It seems to be the case today, that many apologetics communities will accept anybody and everybody. I’m not saying that is wrong necessarily, however, it does somewhat hinder the usage of apologetics properly. Discussion is core within apologetics, and that is something we should be willing and able to do before engaging with apologetics.

    I have however noticed a different and slightly more disturbing trend in my opinion. That is people who seemingly are pretending to be believers in God and have joined this page to sow discord among the believers here. I was trying to have a discussion with someone who accused me of being a heretic for believing that Mary was a virgin and Joseph wasn’t Jesus’ biological father. When I showed him the Bible he claimed that wasn’t what it said, when I pressed him to correct me, he ended up trying to change the subject.

    Has anyone else seen this trend as well?

  4. Rek Init says:

    What do you expect from internet trolls?

  5. Isaac Christian says:

    I joined this group to sharpen the mind, as iron sharpens iron, so man sharpens man. Arguments like the Kalam and Fine Tuning get me excited, one word replies do not….

  6. Stephen Barackman says:

    also the answers that call names and accuse the person of not being a christian

  7. Chad Turner says:

    Not every assertion is worthy of a full rebuttal. Some of them are just a matter of elementary reading comprehension that even a cursory glance at scripture will refute. So what other answer is there to give?

  8. Steven Wells says:

    Sometimes a one word answer is apologetic. Jesus did this sometimes.

  9. Kubowaki Julia says:

    we should focus more on Christ sacrifice and resurrection,and learn how to apply the scripture to become more like Him ,..We MUST become a living bible ,

  10. Emmanuel Scott says:

    This post is a call for true Apologetics! Love it!

  11. Michael White says:

    We (I) must be careful that we (I) don’t win the debate and lose the soul!

  12. Victor Van Der Woude says:

    Nature of the format.

    Sometimes the conversation isn’t about theological arguments but against biases, pre-assumptions and dishonesty.

    So sometimes the so-called question is just a trap or logic/illogical puzzle not connected to any real theological viewpoint. Atheists bait traps.

    So if your expecting questions/verses/arguments for or against verses and counter arguments all the time your going to be disappointed.

  13. Josie Tiscareno says:

    Forgive them. For they know not what they do.

    Some don’t even learn until years later

  14. Michelle Jones McIlvoy says:

    I find this page i retesting. I skip some posts and read others. I also ignore those mean comments.

  15. Perla Douglas says:

    Well said??

  16. Garry Wienhurst says:
  17. Freddy William says:

    I almost left the group thinking the members are just the “wanna be” apologetic…but your post shines a light

  18. Angi Barber says:

    Nothing like making someone feel stupid or worse unsaved or mislead or taking the time to tell someone they arent worth your time because you dont agree with something they have said. But then dont even explain any further why. (All of these things have been said to me and I was kicked out of one group because I realized it was a moderator treating me that way, I was kicked out within minutes of mentioning it.)
    If you dont have something to actually say about a post, dont bother making a comment that is hurtful. We should not have to be telling Chistians this.

  19. Jereme McAlpin says:

    If an OP asked a yes or no question without asking why, I’ll respond with yes or no

  20. Brandon Frost says:

    One word answers usually come from small minds with small thoughts. If they can’t from the thought to defend their position they’ll say “bull” et al.

  21. […] I am saddened that I have to write this post…. […]