What do you think about the evolution? Do you think it’s compatible with the original sin? Do you believe the earth is only thousands of years old?
Discussion
3 comments
-
The fossils and layers are evidence of the Flood. Evolution was conjectured to get rid of God. Have things been produced that couldn’t have been produced without calling Evolution a scientific theory?
-
It’s stupid.. Species devolve and lose genetic information overtime.. I don’t know why they try to teach it as fact. There’s a reason it’s called a theory. And for Godsake why would humans lose their fur and have to wear clothes? Again stupidest theory ever.
-
Macro-evolution is a lie.
The word “evolution” has many different meanings. Two definitions vital to Darwinian evolution are microevoloution and macroevolution.
Microevolution, also called adaption or variation, is a change within a species. The Galapagos finches are a prime example of microevolution. Finches from different Islands have small differences, such as their beaks. However they are all still finches.Macroevolution is the change from one kind of animal to another, such as an ape like creature to a man.
When Darwinists say that evolution is a scientific fact, they are talking about the facts supporting microevolution. They then say macroevolution is true, even though it is not scientifically supported. There is no evidence for macroevolution. There is no evidence observable, demonstrable or repeatable. However macroevolution is presented as fact, even though it isn’t.
Charles Darwin created his theory of macroevolution based on two fundamental concepts: the world and all the animals exist, and that a creator does not exist. The whole theory is a religion against a creator. Using the science behind microevolution, Darwin created the religion of macroevolution. Microevolution is fact, macroevolution is a religion!
Comments