Author

What Should a Church Meeting Look Like?

I know a lot of people in the Church of God, just like in other Pentecostal churches, believe in spiritual gifts, tongues, interpretation, prophecy, words of knowledge, words of wisdom, and of course healing, and various other gifts.

But what do you think about a church meeting where someone stands up and continually shares words of knowledge and prophecies (detailed, which seem to be spot on) without opening the Bible?

Or there is a ‘sermon’ but the message doesn’t include a text of scripture, just testimonies, etc.?

I was watching a few YouTube videos recently, and I saw that. I know growing up Pentecostal, it did seem like you usually just had to have a sermon. But occasionally, we might have a night service where we just sang, prayed, and praised the Lord. Maybe a few tongues and interpretations were given.

I’ve also spent a little time, when I was on the US mainland for brief periods of time, where I’d go to a prophetic movement or signs and wonders type church for a while. A lot of these churches do have some preaching that uses scripture, but they seem light on exegesis and expository preaching. I get the sense that eschatology is not taught on enough in detail for the people who go there to articulate an eschatology, at least not the same one as others who go there, or not one they got at church. But they are into prophesying. And it does seem like some of these people do actually prophesy, get words of knowledge, etc.

It does concern me that in some of these churches, the use of the Bible is kind of ‘light.’ Honestly, I’ve heard some old timey sounding Pentecostals who are heavy on enthusiasm, opinion, and religious cliches and light on the Bible in the past as well.

I do notice that in the Bible, Paul seems rather positive toward the idea of all prophesying when the church come together. The same passage, I Corinthians 14, does mention every one of you having a ‘doctrine’ as well. Other passages emphasize the importance of teaching the word as well. I wouldn’t want to condemn a church for having a whole meeting full of prophecies and words of knowledge. I do believe we need a balance, and that not ever having any teaching of doctrine would be rather unhealthy.

What do you think about church services where there is no sermon?

Discussion

6 comments

  1. Quakers did OK in the earlier years without a sermon. I much prefer solid teaching or Bible study to the traditional sermon. I have access to good books and teaching via Internet or Facebook and find that the traditional role of a sermon may have been important decades ago but not so important now.

  2. Jim Price says:

    A service where real and important communication is going on between believers would have high value.Take for instance where a large plant is rumored to be closing down. It will affect half the congregation and the church budget itself; why shouldn’t it be a concern for prayer, for wisdom, for words of knowledge? Instead of calling for a revival call for nightly meetings to earnestly discuss what could be done for damage control? Done right the church would have a strong draw to others in the community.

  3. CJohn Toropo says:

    Thanks man for the great comments,well how can we hear the voice of God and in what ways,and the frequency?

  4. Charles Page says:

    the idea church gathering is identified in ! Cor 14

  5. I have enjoyed the services when the Holy Spirit takes over. They are refreshing. But saying that the churches are moving away from preaching and doing more teaching goes cross-grained to the teaching set forth by Apostle Paul. 1 Corinthians 1:17-21King James Version (KJV)
    17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
    18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
    19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
    20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
    21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. I am not saying that teaching is wrong. But look at the qualifications for a Bishop. 1 Timothy 3:1-7King James Version (KJV)
    1 This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
    2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
    3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
    4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
    6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
    7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. This says “APT TO TEACH” meaning teaching is not his main focus, and I take it to mean preaching. Getting away from preaching has led our churches down the road of compromise with man’s wisdom.

  6. […] What Should a Church Meeting Look Like? I know a… […]