Author

Does anyone else find it interesting that often times the God-inspired New Testament writers would “quote”/paraphrase or refer to an Old Testament passage of Scripture to “fit” the exegesis of the verse(s) they are writing – regardless of “proper” grammar, syntax, language rules, etc.

For example, in Mark 1:2-3, Mark quotes two prophets – Malachi and Isaiah – regarding John the Baptist’s preparing the way for the LORD, but he changes Malachi’s prophecy from John preparing the way for YHWH (aka Jehovah) to preparing the way for Jesus!

Malachi 3:1 Behold, I send My messenger,
And he will prepare the way before >>>Me…<<< Mark 1:2 As it is written in the Prophets: “Behold, I send My messenger before >>>Your [Jesus’]<<< face, who will prepare Your [Jesus'] way before You [Jesus]. Another example, in Hebrews 1:8-9, Paul (we will presume) quotes the Greek Septuagint's translation of Psalm 45:6-7: Your throne, O [ὁ] God [Θεὸς], is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom. 7 You love righteousness and hate wickedness; Therefore God [ὁ Θεὸς], Your God [ὁ Θεὸς], has anointed You with the oil of gladness more than Your companions. Hebrews 1:8-9 But to the Son [Jesus] He [the Father - see verses 5-7] says: “Your throne, O [ὁ] God [Θεὸς], is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom. 9 You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; Therefore God [ὁ Θεὸς], Your God [ὁ Θεὸς], has anointed You with the oil of gladness more than Your companions.” Psalm 45:6-7 - like the second quote in Hebrews 1:5 is paraphrased from 2 Samuel 7:14 ("I will be to Him a Father, and He shall be to Me a Son") - is a Messianic prophesy with a short-term fulfillment in Solomon and a long-term fulfillment in Christ... though Solomon was not God's only-begotten (unique) Son as is Christ - nor is he God, as is Christ in Psalm 45:6-7. The psalmists - the sons of Korah - were referring to a king as God. No one else besides Jesus could qualify for that title! Yet another example is in the very next three verses, Hebrews 1:10-12, which is a "quote"/paraphrase in which Paul has the Father addressing the Son as the creator of the heavens and the earth - and being unchanging (Malachi 3:6 “For I am the Lord, I do not change; Therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Jacob.), but the "quote"/paraphrase is from the psalmist crediting God with being the creator of the heavens and the earth - and being unchanging in Psalm 102:25-27! Psalm 102:25-27 Of old You laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands. 26 They will perish, but You will endure; Yes, they will all grow old like a garment; Like a cloak You will change them, and they will be changed. 27 But You are the same, and Your years will have no end. Hebrews 1:10-12 NKJV And: “You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands. 11 They will perish, but You remain; And they will all grow old like a garment; 12 Like a cloak You will fold them up, and they will be changed. But You are the same, and Your years will not fail.” To you who have gone to all the lengths to learn grammar, syntax, language rules, etc.of Hebrew and Greek only to find that the inspired New Testament writers had modified the text to fit what God had in mind for them to write and it has been right in front of your eyes for nearly two millennia, I wish I could say, "I feel for you!"

Discussion

7 comments

  1. Hank Parrish says:

    search the scriptures…they are they that testify of me (jesus)

  2. Paul Swan says:

    You have documented the matter well. The deciding factor which I did not hear you speak of much is the Holy Spirit’s overriding inspiration who moved on the writers to find and highlight the double meanings and in this case the higher meanings behind the anciently inspired words. “Out of Egypt I have called my son.” surely had a different meaning in its original application. But the Holy Spirit reached into the statement, converting it into a Messianic application and fulfillment. I don’t mind this technique when the Holy Spirit does it knowing that the Holy Spirit has the sovereign right to imbue His words with whatever truthful meaning that He likes. What gives me the creeps is when men with overactive imaginations embellish the biblical texts, stretching them out of their contexts to “prove” the most loony ideas imaginable. That is scary.

  3. Freddy Jocksand Diaz says:

    What?

  4. Freddy Jocksand Diaz says:

    Who is questioning the writings of the Apostles, eye witnesses of the life of Jesus… realy?

  5. Francisco Soriano says:

    So, what’s your point?

  6. Alexander Ruvalcaba says:

    David Alesso
    Brings up an important point.
    According to Scripture, Christ says that He came to fulfill prior promises, revelation, the law. He also said the Scriptures “Cannot be broken”. And the Bereans searched the Old Testament to verify everything Paul preached, which they were commended for. The references could go on and on. This is to point to the fact that the Bible teaches the Authority of “Prior Revelation”.

    God does not lie nor break His own Word. Therefore: anything God speaks prior can NOT be broken by what He speaks later.

    Prior Revelation (Older books of the Bible) have Authority over Later Revelation (Newer books of the Bible). Because any prophet or their revelation, including Christ’s had to be verified by its adherence to Revelation that had already been previously given by God. So the book of Revelation is judged by Genesis to verify its authenticity. Judged by all the other books of the Bible. Which is why you should read and understand your Bible Chronologically as God gave it.
    If Christ or the Apostles misinterpret the Old Testament, are poor exegetes, or use poor hermeneutics, then they are false and NOT the Christ or the Apostles. Don’t forget that Christ’s entire argument with the Sadducees over a doctrine as Hugely Important as the Resurrection was to point out to them just the “tense” of a single word from Exodus. Which He rebuked them as not knowing the Scriptures for their error on that 1 tiny piece.

    This supposed issue of how the New Testament Authors “misused” or “improperly interpreted” Old Testament texts has been dealt with many times in the past, to the point that it may not necessarily be true. If we don’t understand why they interpret something from the Old Testament the way they do, chances are WE don’t understand or are ignorant, not that THEY used illegitimate hermeneutics.
    So the Son of God, did not give Himself the authority to overturn or give different meaning to His own Word. He was the exemplar of proper hermeneutics and exegesis, He did not cast Biblical interpretation into confusion. That’s a false idea in the Church today, spread by liberal and non-believing scholars.

    For instance, Matthew quotes, “out of Egypt, I called my son”.
    This is a verse from Exodus, and simply about God bringing the people of Israel out of Egypt. BUT!! Matthew does not quote Exodus, he quotes Hosea!!!
    Why??!! Because Hosea was quoting Exodus and using that saying in a new way for prophecy that God was giving him when he wrote, and expanded the implication pertaining to salvation, and it is in THAT context and meaning in Hosea that Matthew was referring to in his use of it for Christ. Not the original use in Exodus.
    This is only 1 example of how this old list of perceived misinterpretations by New Testament writers is not necessarily true.

    A great book on the subject is: Hermeneutics of the Biblical Writers

    https://www.amazon.com/Hermeneutics-Biblical-Writers-Interpret-Scripture/dp/0825443245/ref=nodl_

  7. […] Does anyone else find it interesting that often times the… […]