Author

[https://barryhisblog.blogspot.com/p/russells-celestial-eapot.html](https://barryhisblog.blogspot.com/p/russells-celestial-eapot.html)

From “Is there a God?” by Bertrand Russell,
* Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.

If I were to say to you that your opinion, that the Teapot doesn’t exist, is in fact a belief, and that the onus is on you to justify that belief, would you think I was nuts?

From “Is there a God?” by Bertrand Russell, Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received…

Discussion

2 comments

  1. Loel Passe says:

    If you do not (or simply will not) take into the account the “ultra fine tuning of the universe” (which will simply not allow the mathematical possibility of random chance forming all of this) then what is the point of offering and other facts or observations? You can’t see the Forest for the trees !

  2. […] From “Is there a God?” by Bertrand Russell, Many orthodox… […]