Author

Thoughts on William Lane Craig?

Knowing that to many, my defense of William Lane Craig will inevitably have my Christian card revoked, I cannot go by without saying anything about this issue any longer. Time after time, I see mind-numbing simplistic dismissals of Craig’s work for very silly reasons. This would encompass the firs…

Discussion

36 comments

  1. James Goyen says:

    Why are some Christians getting their panties in a bunch if you defend him?
    From a lot of the apologists I’ve heard talk, he’s one of the more reasonable ones out there.

  2. Melissa Keoprasa says:

    And he admits when he could be wrong!

  3. Daniel Marvin says:

    Well written and thoughtful — much to agree with there. I especially liked the identification of the knee-jerk reactionary types who will never allow any speculative, exploratory or nuanced conversation without the resulting misquoting and labeling.

  4. Corey Matthew says:

    I dont buy into his old earth view, but he’s top notch.

  5. Marta Paula Bendelová says:

    I have met him in Dublin personally and he is not only one of the best christian apologists but also a very nice and humble person… ?

  6. Marek Wawrzyniak says:

    Love him.

  7. Ricky Harper says:

    Love this guy.

  8. Andrew Azariah says:

    WLC is OEC I think.

  9. Jarod Brooks says:

    He’s awesome. Been listening to him for going on eight years now.

  10. Tony Mikhaiel says:

    Orthodox enough…..

    Needs to trust the Word of God more then philosophy though…

  11. Larry Georgescu says:

    His arguments for the existence of God and other things are brilliant, he’s weak on predestination tho I think..

  12. Ray Hilmus says:

    He is refreshingly unbiased about things.

  13. Joe A Smith says:

    CRAIG is a molinist

  14. Chad Wilkerson says:

    Incredible apologist and even better theologian. He’s probably been the #1 influence on my personal faith outside of the Bible itself and spiritual leaders I know personally – more than any author, preacher, speaker, whathaveyou. He’s the real deal.

  15. Josh LeClear says:

    Young earth creationism is embarrassing. Craig is the best apologist that has ever lived.

  16. Stephen Atkins says:

    He’s a molinist.

  17. Michael Connolly says:

    I’ve yet to see anyone repent from his evidentiary apologetic.

    Maybe they have, but I haven’t seen it.

    Intellectual sophistry is pointless.

    #presup
    #gospelapologetics
    #doctrinesofgrace

  18. Reformed Theologian says:

    I love this brother .One biggest problem i have with is his view on the the character of God and time ,his view is that sense God came into time the person of Jesus Christ ,that now is subjected (this is God were talking about here) forever to time never able to go back to being out side time .

  19. David Pendleton says:

    I think some YEC are embarrassing sometimes, too. How about old Earth creation plus young human creation and read Genesis without a literal definition of Yom (day). I still believe Genisis to be true word of God, I still believe Adam & Eve were the first individual people God created. We Christians need to stop arguing over non-essentials.
    And William Lane Craig is a great man, and a wonderful defender of Christian faith.

  20. David Pendleton says:

    Understanding Molinism isn’t a task for the faint of heart. It is to me a brilliant line of thinking which makes God’s complete & perfect sovereignty and the necessity of human free will make sense together. Molinist ideas don’t make Craig a heretic, it only proves he is a very deep and thorough thinker. More power to him.

  21. Jereme McAlpin says:

    For a guy who gets so much right, he gets so much wrong.

  22. John Chappel says:

    You mean thoughts on his theology? Personally, Craig was thr first apologist I ever heard online. He’s the reason why I started to study all about this stuff. Regarding his theology, I haven’t looked seriously into it.

  23. Danny Wilder says:

    IMHO he belittles the Creator and his power by denying that the world was created in six days, six thousand years ago. The Bible clearly shows this and states it in the fourth commandment. Craig is bowing to the words of men instead of trusting the Word of God.

  24. Brian Ressel says:

    Huge fan of WLC. His podcasts are a great resource. Especially dig Molinism. I agree with him on the embarrassment of YEC. So many young people get turned off of Christianity because of it.

  25. Mateus Lima says:

    Sorry guys, but what does molinist means?

  26. Paul Matthew Wilson says:

    I love this man. I thank God for his ministry. Along with Ravi Zacharias and Frank Turek, he is one of the apologists who helped me open the door to return to Christ.

  27. David Castro says:

    can’t stand him

  28. Grant Reedy says:

    If you want to argue with a carnal mind with carnal minded non believers, Craig has a lot of good arguments.

    Though if you want to have Objective Truth and morality of the scriptures, then one needs to look to the promise of Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of truth as God gives the increase of His Word by His Spirit, never by the carnal man.

    Drops the ?!

  29. Taoro Strickland says:

    I really like him & Dr Frank Turek so far. That’s from a simple humble high school graduate myself lol

  30. Clay Atwater says:

    Brilliant at defending the existence of God and the faith, but a train wreck theologically in certain areas.

  31. Chad Wilkerson says:

    I keep reading criticisms of Craig that are either outright falsehoods or incredibly vague. If you’re going to bash a guy who does so much good for the Kingdom, it’s only fair that you’re specific and cite his words and/or scripture in support of your argument. This is an apologetics page, after all.

  32. Dale Johnson says:

    Love many things but he believes science (pseudoscience that is) over the Bible. Sad.

  33. Adam Mathis says:

    He’s a molonist ?

  34. John Thomas says:

    He’s a theist. 😛