Author

Good news for atheists, you’re not a distant cousin of a monkey, bad news for you; there’s a God-

I once asked an atheist “what’s your evidence for Macro evolution”; his response was “Chromosome 2.”
I looked into Chromosome 2, and immediately found questions to some fundamentally flawed concepts of their lie which can’t be answered.

It astounds me, 1. The lengths Darwinian scientists go to brainwash their followers to believe we’re descendants of the “great apes”, and 2. The amount of willfully ignorant allegiance to such baseless assertions. Blind faith in the pseudoscience religion of evolution is a cheap alternative to “allowing a divine foot in the door” as worded by one of the greatest leaders in evolutionary biology- “We take the side of science in spite of the blatant absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.”-Professor Richard Lewontin

Highlight “just so stories”, that’s precisely what “chromosome 2” is in a nutshell; according to this lie, allegedly 2 chimpanzee chromosomes fused together to form human Chromosome 2, why you might ask?

Two reasons.. 1.) “just so”, 2.) because it looks like it hypothetically could happen, therefore in Darwin land it did. Read the article I’ll link for further details.
(please refrain yourself from using to the “appeal to authority” and or the “poison the well” fallacies to dismiss the article I use, rather use literacy to refute the arguments made in it)

Taken together, genomic data for both the alleged fusion and cryptic centromere sites refute the concept of fusion in a human-chimpanzee common ancestor.

Discussion

11 comments

  1. Parker Roberts says:

    The problem with atheistic evolution isn’t necessarily that man and apes COULD share a common ancestor, but it’s that everything MUST.
    Everything from a blade of grass, to an elephant, to a starfish, to a human, MUST all share a SINGULAR common ancestor.

  2. Ricky Harper says:

    I agree completely, how anyone can conclude a modern human has adapted to its habitat is beyond me. I can even stand in direct sunlight for 30 minutes.

  3. GodfredWealth Kwakye says:

    Kwame Tsedek Paul Cuticle

  4. Luis Y Jennette says:

    One question. Are you aware of any other scientific theory that enjoys scientific consensus while it being pseudoscience and having the scientists that subscribe to it engage in brainwashing?

  5. Michael J. Bisbano says:

    Apes were always and still are apes and humans still are and were always humans.

  6. Daniel Feher says:

    There is nothing wrong with what professor Richard has stated. That’s what science is, we test everything to come to a conclusion. Searching for evidence in the material world which is materialism.

  7. Enrico Cocu Acorce says:

    Personally, my thinking has always been that of a layman (though I spend time reading on scientific discoveries and apologetics).

    My question has always been simple, “When you take a look at the television you’re immediately struck by the fact that someone came up with it. It is a complex piece of technology internally. How would you feel if future generations came up with unsubstantiated theories on how the tv made itself? How much more the world and the life in it?”
    Seriously it beats the hell out of me! Won’t you call their theories absurd??

    Bless you all

  8. Wheyes W Guye says:

    “Chimpanzee and Human failed family reunion ends in MAULING – news at 11”

  9. […] Taken together, genomic data for both the alleged fusion and… […]