The most promising candidate for a “natural engine” is proton…

THIS POST IS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE LIFE, THE ARTICLE BELOW, THE LIMITATION OF SCIENCE, AN ARGUMENT IN FAVOUR OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD, AND THE ARTICLE BELOW
1.) Every time we observe nature bringing life into being we notice the following, namely that nature cannot bring another living thing into being independent of the prior existence of another living thing. 2.) Prior to the coming into being of the first living things there were no living things in the earth. And subsequently 3.) nature could not have caused the first living things to come into being. 4.) If nature could have caused the first living things to come into being, then the coming into being of the first living things is inexplicable by the laws of nature. Hence 5.) the coming into being of the first living things is inexplicable by the laws of nature. 6.) If the coming into being of the first living things is inexplicable by the laws of nature, then the coming into being of the first living things is a supernatural event, because a supernatural event is, by definition, any event that is inexplicable by the laws of nature. Hence 7.) the coming into being of the first living things was a supernatural event. 8.) If the coming into being of the first living things was a supernatural event, then the best explanation for the supernatural event known as the coming into being of the first living things is God. Therefore 9.) God exists. Finally, it is important to note the implication of the aforementioned inductive/deductive argument. The implication is as follows, namely that the scientist will never be able to understand how life came into being by means of science. Why? Here’s why: Science is a systematic way or methodical way of understanding the nature by means of testing, observation, experimentation, the formulation of theories, and “GENERAL LAWS”. However the argument is indicative of the following, namely that the coming into being of the first living things is inexplicable by the laws of nature; and therefore the scientist will never be able to understand how life came into being. It is also important to note the following, namely that the argument is not indicative of the this, that is, that any thing we cannot understand is a supernatural event. On the contrary the argument is indicative of the following, namely that the coming into being of life is a supernatural event because it cannot be TRULY understood by means of nature; since God did not use natural processes to create the first living things. Not only that! For this is also why the origin of life will never be understood by means of the scientific method.

The most promising candidate for a “natural engine” is proton flows across thermal vents that theoretically could generate high-energy molecules.