All #ourCOG News 5.0
There is a lot of apologetic value in this information.
Discussion
7 comments
-
Evolutionists claim this is nothing more than a “broken ironstone concretion, one that may have suffered from erosion.” They claim that “such concretions tend to display ovoid shapes and concentric banding like” this print. They also claim that “Concretions are hard to compact accumulations of mineral matter and are found inside sedimentary rocks. Often concretions are mistaken for bones, fossils, meteorites and other odd objects. They can be so small that it requires a magnifying glass to be visible or as large as 10 feet in diameter and weigh hundreds of pounds. Concretions can also have somewhat of regular shapes such as boxes, blocks, flat disks, pipes, cannonballs and have even been known to resemble parts of a human body such as a foot or ribs.”
Hmm. This artifact and all the documentation for it held by the scientific community has conveniently disappeared and cannot be analyzed using modern techniques. Coincidence? Romans 1:18 comes to mind concerning those who reject God willfully suppressing the truth by unrighteousness. It makes me wonder how many actual pre-flood human remains and artifacts have been conveniently written off as concretions. After all, the artifacts don’t get examined by unbiased people!
-
15 million.
-
The earth is no more than 6000 years old
-
It turns out this is indeed a concretion and not a fossil shoe print. The photomicrographs have not disappeared and the artifact itself was never in the permanent possession of any museum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWBo-ecRhlo&feature=youtu.be
-
There’s a lot of formations and impressions that can look like something from contemporary times.
Like theropod footprints in sediment that, when eroded, tend to ‘look like’ human footprints.
Comments