Author

There seems to be occasional friction between evidential and presuppositional apologists? Is this division warranted? How can both approaches assist average Christians in making the case for what they believe?

There seems to be occasional friction between evidential and presuppositional apologists? Is this division warranted?

Discussion

4 comments

  1. Larry Koester says:

    The presuppostion of Scripture proof is what makes the evidence proof telling

  2. Jay Zeke Malakai says:

    There ought never be friction between apologists. We cannot reach the lost if we cannot reach each other. Preach the truth in love, or shush, because noisy gongs are of no use to anyone.

  3. Jeremy Bickel says:

    Paul spoke to each person in their own terms. 1 Corinthians 9:19-23

  4. Damien Lacks says:

    I made a post which presented a renewed conversation I was having with someone who only knows what T.f.jakes, fred price and the like have taught him about Jesus. I would appreciate any feedback on the way I handled the conversation. I’d like to make sure I am correctly handling the word of truth as I am a recent “new convert” as I grew up somewhat deceived to.

    Please if you get a chance. Any feedback is welcomed

    https://m.facebook.com/groups/1493330220801352?view=permalink&id=1837897879677916