Author
TWO SUPPOSED PROOF TEXTS FOR KEEPING THE MOSAIC LAW; “If…

TWO SUPPOSED PROOF TEXTS FOR KEEPING THE MOSAIC LAW;

“If you love me, you will keep my commandments. (John 14:15, ESV)

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. (Matthew 5:17, ESV)

They simply don’t understand or comprehend that Jesus didn’t give the law, moses did;

For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. (John 1:17, ESV)

He answered them, “What did Moses command you?” (Mark 10:3, ESV)

Christ came to FULFIL the law because we couldn’t, Jesus gave a NEW LAW, that means new commandments which can be summed up in;

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. (John 13:34, ESV)

Jesus was the better moses with a better covenant, you can’t mix the two;

21 No one sews a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old garment. If he does, the patch tears away from it, the new from the old, and a worse tear is made. 22 And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. If he does, the wine will burst the skins-and the wine is destroyed, and so are the skins. But new wine is for fresh wineskins.” (Mark 2:21-22, ESV)

You can’t be justified by the law and you can’t be sanctified by the law;

2 Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? 3 Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh? 4 Did you suffer so many things in vain-if indeed it was in vain? 5 Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith- (Galatians 3:2-5, ESV)

The old covenant is obselete;

In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. (Hebrews 8:13, ESV)

Discussion

4 comments

  1. Dwight Osborne says:

    who was Jesus’ audience? The Jews. As you probably know the best way to interpret Scripture is to compare Scripture to Scripture. According to Scripture in Exodus 19:3-6 the Lord spoke to Moses these words, “while Moses went up to God. The LORD called to him out of the mountain, saying, “Thus you shall say to the house of Jacob, and tell the people of Israel: 4‘You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself. 5Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; 6and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words that you shall speak to the people of Israel.” He was told to speak to the “sons of the house of Jacob” (there were 12) and to “Israel”. That’s pretty specific. Next evidence: while I’ve not done so, count the number of times you read “hear O Israel” vs. “hear o Gentiles, hear o believer or hear o Church”. Thirdly, who did Moses represent? Who was he the leader of? Granted, growing up in the house of Pharoah as the adopted grandson of Pharoah he had power, authority and influence with Gentiles. Yet here’s what Hebrews 11:23-29 tells us, “23By faith Moses, when he was born, was hidden for three months by his parents, because they saw that the child was beautiful, and they were not afraid of the king’s edict. 24By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, 25choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. 26He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward. 27By faith he left Egypt, not being afraid of the anger of the king, for he endured as seeing him who is invisible. 28By faith he kept the Passover and sprinkled the blood, so that the Destroyer of the firstborn might not touch them. 29By faith the people crossed the Red Sea as on dry land, but the Egyptians, when they attempted to do the same, were drowned.” If all the above weren’t enough evidence, there’s one more passage that makes it perfectly clear. It’s found in Psalm 147:19, 20-“He declares his word to Jacob,
    his statutes and rulesc to Israel.
    20He has not dealt thus with any other nation;
    they do not know his rules.d
    Praise the LORD!” And if that’s not enough evidence there’s Colossians 2:14, the letter to the church in Galatia and the epistle of Hebrews is all about Christ providing a better and perfect way. Still, people want to argue the issue even in the light of God’s word. Apparently the Judaizers are still among us

  2. Budy Harianto says:

    i think this kind of nuance languange is heritage from western church till its peak in german protestanism in early 19. … by its realization with so called holocaust,..
    wanting replacement jews with church, law with grace…
    at that time german scholars were leading in all major theology,..
    somehow is succeded smugled unto us today…?
    who can back me up?..

    Jesus or Paul never claim to be christian, but their names was used to such extend…

    something gone wrong in the theology in the first church shism from jewish to gentile…
    even nowdays with so much civilised good scholar we don managed that kind of “gap”….
    part a question of power (political) and authority (originality)..?

  3. Surah Weyer says:

    God gave the law to Moses and Moses to the people. Jesus isn’t the new Moses, He’s the new Adam. That being said, I agree on the rest of this post.

  4. […] TWO SUPPOSED PROOF TEXTS FOR KEEPING THE MOSAIC LAW; “If… […]