Author

Evolution is NOT Science (Rather, it’s a Religion)…

*From the new “evolution crushing” book… “EVOLUTION: A FAIRYTALE FOR ALL AGES.” (Available on Amazon). 177 (easy to read) topics on 323 pages prove EVOLUTION is a LIE, GOD created everything, and JESUS is ALIVE!

Evolution is a Religion.” – Michael Ruse (evolutionist and past professor of philosophy and zoology at the University of Guelph, Canada)

The birdbrained Theory of Evolution is actually not science (i.e. must be observed in nature or the laboratory) as many people believe and are taught. Rather it is simply the worldview of evolutionists.

“My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. It is not even possible to make a ‘caricature’ of an evolution out of paleobiological facts… The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief.” – Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson (Esteemed Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University)

Actually, the fatuous theory of evolution is a Religion. The religion of naturalism (atheism).

A dictionary DEFINITION of RELIGION is: a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance. Many will passionately claim that evolution is true science and vehemently argue that it’s not a religion, but they are incorrect. Rather, it is the definition of faith, of religion, and not observable and repeatable science

Evolution is only faith, a religion. Nothing More!!

Discussion

21 comments

  1. Michael Holford says:
  2. Alex Tworek says:

    *From the new “evolution crushing” book… “EVOLUTION: A FAIRYTALE FOR ALL AGES.” ?????????

    That book came out 12 years ago; it’s not new. And if it “crushed” evolution, then why is evolution still such a popular belief and decidedly uncrushed?

    And to say that things that cannot be directly observed are anti-science, then the entire scientific discipline of geology would also be anti-science.

    It’s incorrect to conflate naturalism and atheism. Some atheists still believe in the supernatural, for example.

    And the definition of religion as “a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance,” leaves the door open to classify almost anything as a religion. Some Christians clearly care more about football than Jesus. Would it be fair for me to say that their religion is the Green Bay Packers? Or their jobs? Or their wives? Or their drug addictions? Or politics? Or knitting?

  3. Jerry Spencer says:

    This argument has become increasingly popular in recent years as creationists have tried to bolster their own position by decorating it with scientific-sounding words like intelligent design. And as they try to convince us that their own position is science based, they correspondingly mock evolution by calling it a religion of those who worship Darwin as a prophet and accept its tenets on faith since there is no evidence supporting evolution. Clearly this is an argument that could only be persuasive to people who know little or nothing about the concept of evolution or Darwin’s role in its development. This argument is easily dismissed. A religion is the worship of a supernatural divine superbeing, and there is nothing anywhere in the theory of evolution that makes reference to such a being, and not a single living human considers himself a member of any “evolution church.”

  4. Tommy S. Hancock says:

    .
    A very simple, a very straight-forward question to ask about the “Theory of Evolution(TEV)” is this:

    What good is the “Theory of Evolution?”

  5. Jeremy Stagner says:

    To the perishing, the Word of God is foolishness, but to the saved, the Word of God is the power of God.

  6. Lawrence Gough says:

    It’s ok to believe either way.

  7. Randy Hroziencik says:

    Micro is science, but macro is a religious ideology.

  8. Jerry Spencer says:

    Even if it were shown that evolution was false, that would not give any support to the idea of God or any credence to the Bible.

    “Increasingly and astonishingly, the fossils being discovered included the bones of previously unknown giants; what we today know as megalosaurs, mammoths, plesiosaurs, pterodactyls, ichthyosaurs, and more. Using comparative anatomy, biologists showed these were extinct antediluvian animals; that is to say, animals that had lived and completely died out before the biblical flood of Noah. Some thought that meant there had to have been more than one cataclysmic flood… but even with that attempt at explanation, biologists couldn’t explain how Noah’s flood could have killed these prehistoric fish and enormous marine creatures too! To make matters worse, ancient human remains and flint hand axes were found in the bed of the river Somme in France – at the same layer as extinct elephants and rhinoceros. From their position in the strata, it was clear they were considerably older than the bible’s chronology allowed. Geologists like James Hutton and Charles Lyell went further, demonstrating unmistakable signs of what came to be called Deep Time: the realization that slow, inexorable geological processes had been changing the face of the Earth – and still were – for far longer than anyone had ever dared guess.”

    “David Fitzgerald”

  9. Christoph Schwaiger says:

    It’s funny that YEC demand the highest levels of proof from the scientific community such as: have you ever seen a dog produce a non dog? Didn’t think so. But yet they themselves are content with believing stories from an ancient book.

  10. Jelaya Stewart says:

    Evolution is a false belief you need faith to believe in evolution period!

  11. Michael Holford says:

    This is one of those “as conscience dictates” issues in which we have freedom in Christ to arrive at our own conclusions.

    Since the beginning of Christianity, believers have held a diversity of cosmologies and interpretations of Hebrew creation stories.

  12. Ava Reyes says:

    Charlie published his book 150 years ago.
    He got a lot of things wrong, but the basic idea of evolution through natural selection was correct.
    This is one of the reasons I can’t ever be a Christian. I could never embarrass myself by believing and posting such blatant science denial.

  13. Zach Payne says:

    What are other reasons for not being a Christian

  14. Kenny Wong says:

    It is not a science because science doesn‘t work that way. When you said that water dissolves into oxygen and hydrogen it is falsifiable.
    When you say birds are evolved from single cell organisms it is not falsifiable.
    Worse, when you say is evolved from where A and B can be any out of the billion living organisms existing and existed on earth, it is not falsifiable.
    It is like a claim saying that chemical reactions exist but making not a single one of them falsifiable.

  15. Tommy S. Hancock says:

    SCOTUS

    Torcaso v Watkins (1961)
    Torcaso officially declared atheism to be a religion, empowering militant atheists to invoke the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to demand the removal of all existing Christian infrastructure in government.

  16. Jerry Spencer says:

    People are welcome to believe evolution is false.

    People choose not to believe evolution because it is counter to what the Bible says.

    Evolution was developed to explain why fossils were where they were found and why they appeared to change over time.

    The Bible is a collection of writings from ancient times; of a Semitic, desert people, the Hebrews.

    Why people choose to believe the Bible is hard to imagine. It is just the legends placed in the backdrop of history.

    It is a human creation, of a people who only knew what this ancient people could know at the time.

    Nothing more.

  17. Jelaya Stewart says:

    Evolution is not real it’s a myth.

  18. Caleb Jackson says:

    You know atheists are not the only ones who accept Evolution, right?

  19. Jim Grosso says:

    Is there observable repeatable evidence of evolution?

  20. Jo Kothenbeutel says:

    Evolution is a belief system.
    It requires faith to believe too.

    Its not 1 theory but hundreds of theories wrapped into 1.

    You can examine each theory and then you realize they’re not backed not solid evidence and they’re just assumptions backed with more assumptions and no scientific evidence to verify it and cant be tested over and over again with repeatable results

    How God created everything can’t be known also.

    In both cases we can’t find out how things were exactly created.

  21. […] Evolution is NOT Science (Rather, it’s a Religion)… *From the… […]