“I think theists are more likely to think than the people who called themselves ‘thinkers’.”
“I think theists are more likely to think than the people who called themselves ‘thinkers’.”
Atheists typically don’t play by their own rules.
This is a straw-man argument. Why do theists create a false narrative and then attack it, instead of attacking the actual narrative? ?
Real atheists are ashamed of these people who they call themselves as “the new atheists” or internet atheists
I know maybe one person who believes that truth is relative. That view is certainly not intrinsic to Atheism and it’s not even that common. As others have pointed out, OP is a strawman.
“Is scientific Atheism a frivolous attempt at intellectual contempt? Dead on!” David Berlinski. Atheists must steal from the theistic world view to hold a conversation. Pure foolishness.
Nicholas Paul Beharry
I think truth exists and god doesn’t.
Exactly.
they’ll argue that you’re playing simple word semantic games
If only it was that easy.
Nobody says “there is no truth”. That doesn’t even make sense, as the word ‘truth’ needs a referent or referents for it to be coherent. It’s like asking if “height” exists.
“Truth” in regards to what?
Christians have to misrepresent the atheist to beat the argument that they pretend they have.
Comments