Atheism and evolution cannot speak for things before life, they…
Atheism and evolution cannot speak for things before life, they can only speak for things that are after life, in other words in the atheistic world view, they can only speak for the now and the what but not the why and how, even when they explain the “how”, it cannot explain the why, and it also cannot explain how exactly did the how come about either: essentially it is a constant circle with atheist, and evolutionist.
THIS POST ABOUT AN ARGUMENT IN FAVOUR OF GOD’S EXISTENCE
The argument is as follows;
Every living being we’ve ever seen that came into being had an explanation of its existence in an external living being. (Biogenesis)
The first living thing to come into being in earth was a living being.
Hence that living thing had an explanation of its existence in an external living being.
However that living being could not have had an explanation of its existence in an external being, particularly because, if did, no living thing would exist today. Furthermore if it did not have an explanation of its existence in the necessity of its own nature, then no living thing would exist today. However living things exist today.
And subsequently that living being has an explanation of its existence in the necessity of its own nature. Hence every living thing that exists today has an explanation of its respective existence in a living being or a necessary being. And subsequently every living thing has an explanation of its existence in God.
Therefore God exists.
Finally, please do not post a biological evolutionary response against this argument.
Here is why;
Because biological evolution is not about the coming into being of life. On the contrary it is about that which “allegedly” happened to life after it came into being.
What allegedly happened?
The allegation is as follows, namely that life changed with modification and became diverse by means of environmental changes, natural selection, and random mutations.
So don’t! Please don’t! Lol???