Recorded on June 6, 2019 in Italy. To comment please go to https://www.hoover.org/research/mathematical-challenges-darwins-theory-evolution-david-berlinski-s…
Recorded on June 6, 2019 in Italy. To comment please go to https://www.hoover.org/research/mathematical-challenges-darwins-theory-evolution-david-berlinski-s…
From Francis Collins, evangelical Christian and head of the Human Genome Project: “As someone who’s had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I’ve had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before.
It’s also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming.
I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that”.
Trying to disprove evolution through probability is an odd choice, when its demonstrable, and the probability of the creator model is infinitely less likely due to elements of the creator claim.
Great video… I watched it yesterday… I am wondering if Dr Stephen Meyer has helped David Berlinski with his doubts on God? I first heard about David Berlinski via Ravi Zacharias- Ravi had said David Borders on the line of atheism and is leaning more towards agnostic… Does anyone know how Davis is doing?
David Berlinski:
1. Has anyone provided a proof of God’s inexistence? Not even close.
> 2. Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close.
> 3. Have the sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close.
> 4. Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough.
> 5. Has rationalism in moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough.
> 6. Has secularism in the terrible twentieth century been a force for good? Not even close to being close.
> 7. Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy of thought and opinion within the sciences? Close enough.
> 8. Does anything in the sciences or in their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even in the ballpark.
> 9. Is scientific atheism a frivolous exercise in intellectual contempt? Dead on.
How did the lord create the universe in 6 days ?
Comments