Author

This is a very sincere question. There’s what’s called “specified complexity”.
Specified complexity is a term used to describe sequences which are both specific and complex simultaneously.

An example is a watch. Have you ever seen all the moving parts within the inside of a watch? Without even the smallest of gears turning within this complex machine, the entire clock would be obsolete.
Every living organism has micro level “gears” if you will, which work in sequence to give the organism life. Without even the smallest of the “gears” within the biology of living organisms the life would die.. The examples of specified complexity within the human body alone is enough to question the theory of evolution, which organ evolved first in the first “living species”?
The heart or the lungs?
Do you believe a mammal can live without either of these working simultaneously? That requires more faith than believing a talking snake.. Specified complexity in the cell itself is enough to prove that life isn’t the result of a chaotic, naturalistic spontaneous miracle.
But unfortunately our skeptic friends hold to their pseudoscience fairytale.

An atheist once asked me “creationism is only the lack of belief in evolution, why should we teach it In schools when all it’s founded on is debunking Evolution?” The answer is because the truth isn’t made, a Lie is. Therefor we use the already grounded truth to refute the made up lie such as “evolution” and “spontaneous eruption”..

Discussion

9 comments

  1. Bradley Curnow says:
  2. John Delmore says:

    There were many, less complex, machines before there were watches.

  3. Benjamin Rejiester says:

    If it was true, all you would have to do is demonstrate it was true, not show that some other idea is false.

    You do know that cancer happens when something goes wrong in a cell, and when that happens, it doesn’t die, it flourishes… so no, if something changes in a cell it doesn’t automatically die. It can just start working differently.

  4. Wendy Domino says:

    One thing I’d like to point out is that eukaryotic cells are supposedly the result of a fusion event… basically the cells incorporated other cells into them which formed things like the mitochondria. If this actually occurred it had to be by God’s hand in my opinion as this is a very unusual thing to happen spontaneously.

  5. Samuel Iskandar says:

    I wonder whtll happen if this post posted in an atheist group..

  6. George Albinus says:

    modern evolution is simply the old myth of spontaneous generation made over.

  7. George Albinus says:

    Another important observation is if a part of the cell loses it’s function as it does in cancer, it ceases to benefit the organism and is in fact contributing to it’s death. What is flourishing in cancer cells is death. So it remains a fact that if one part of a cell ceases to function or function properly the cell will either die or become something the kills. This once again proves that the first unicellular organism could no more have come here by chance than a tornado in a junk yard producing a space shuttle.

  8. Wendy Beard says:

    God created the original ancestors of every kind of living thing as adults on Creation Week. Since then, everything reproduces from its parents. God designed the whole process from conception to ready to be born or hatched, how the living being develops. This is a God-designed process, not an evolution.

  9. […] This is a very sincere question. There’s what’s called “specified… […]