Author

Sola Scriptura, Right?

What about this?

Another “coincidence” found in the King James Bible.

The First and the Last Verses of the Bible.

I believe we can see the miraculous hand of God – who himself is the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End – on the King James Bible, and that He has worked in history to give us a perfect Book that has this same pattern in the Beginning and the End of His Book.

Genesis 1:1 KJB – “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”

Revelation 22:21 KJB – “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.”

BOTH verses in the King James Bible have 44 letters and of these 17 are vowels and 27 of them are consonants.

This cannot be done with the NKJV because it does not read as does the King James Bible in Genesis 1:1.

The NKJV says: “In the beginning God created the heavenS and the earth.”

You will notice the NKJV (along with the ESV, NASB, NIV, NET) has the plural HEAVENS instead of the singular HEAVEN of the KJB, and besides having 45 letters instead of the 44 of the KJB, they are also WRONG.

See “Bible Babble in the Book of Genesis – Yea, hath God said?- Part One” to find out why the KJB got it right and the NKJV and others didn’t.

[https://brandplucked.webs.com/genesisstudy.htm](https://brandplucked.webs.com/genesisstudy.htm)

And when we get to the modern Vatican supervised text versions like the constantly changing ESV, NASB, NIV, Holman Standard and NET versions (which don’t even agree with each other) Revelation 22:21 is textually very different from the King James Bible.

Let’s take a look at how these various versions read.

The KJB says: “The grace of OUR Lord Jesus CHRIST be with YOU all. AMEN.”

ESV, NASB – The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.”

Omit “our” adds “the”, omits “Christ” and omits “you”

NIV – “The grace of the Lord Jesus be with GOD’S PEOPLE. Amen.”

Omits “our, Christ, you” and NO Greek text reads “God’s people” but is a complete paraphrase of “the saints”

Holman Christian Standard Bible – “The grace of the Lord Jesus be with ALL THE SAINTS. Amen.

Holman omits “our, Christ, you” and NO Greek text read “ALL the saints”.

The Westcott-Hort originally went with the reading of “with the saints” and omitted the word “all”. “With the saints” is the reading of Sinaiticus. But Alexandrinus reads simply reads “with all”

This is why both the Revised Version of 1881 and the ASV of 1901 both read: “The grace of the Lord Jesus be WITH THE SAINTS. AMEN.”

Later on the Critical Greek text changed from “with the saints” to “with all” and the omitted the word AMEN, and that is how it reads now. But the Holman chose to combine two different Greek texts and doesn’t follow any particular Greek manuscript, nor the UBS/Nestle-Aland and it reads “with all the saints.”

And along with the NASB, ESV and NIV it ADDS the word AMEN, even though both Westcott-Hort and the UBS/Nestle-Aland Critical Greek texts OMIT it!

The only one here that actually follows the most recent UBS/Nestle-Aland Critical Greek texts is the NET bible, which reads:

Dan Wallace’s NET bible – “The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all.”

This one omits “our”, “Christ”, “you” and “Amen”!

And they call these shenanigans the “science” of textual criticism.

In any event, you have to admit that it is a pretty amazing “coincidence” that in the King James Bible the very First and the Last verses in the entire Bible both contain the same number of words, letters, vowels and consonants and the others do not.

For other examples like this plus a lot more, see “**Reasons Why The King James Bible Is The Absolute Standard – God’s Historic Witness to the Truth”

[https://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm**](https://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm)

All of grace, believing the Book – the King James Holy Bible.

Feel free use or distribute any of these articles you think will be of help to others in defending and believing that the King James Holy Bible is the complete, inspired, inerrant, 100% historically true and doctrinally pure words of the living God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. “Freely ye hav…

Discussion

22 comments

  1. Ralph T. A. Ranger says:

    How many constant and vowels in the original Protosemtic language and koine Greek?

    If the original doesn’t fit this pattern does that make the original texts wrong and the KJV right?

    Also seems to me that with all the different translations you listed for revelation 22:21,
    That the differences are semantics and the message is the same.

    Given that the word “Christ” is a title meaning anointed one or king. What about a language that doesn’t have a word for king or anointed one. How can you translate the KJV into their language? Or do they just not get to know God?

  2. Stephen Valenta says:

    This is the worst KJV onliest attempt yet.

  3. David Thomas says:

    I have a 1599 Geneva Bible with updated spelling and no interpretational changes. The original had some issues in Revelation (too many e’s, so sad), but now everything’s spelled right, so the letter counts match. Maybe I think it’s the perfect Bible, and the KJV is just an upstart by the state to undermine the work of good Christians, because in your view, there can only be one, so everything else must be bad.

    Also, when Moses wrote Genesis 1:1, Hebrew had no way of writing vowels (the pointer system was not developed until around 1000 years after Christ by the Masoretes), so the vowel counts in the original languages definitely do not match up.

  4. Colin Spotswood says:

    Verse structure was man-made. Are you suggesting that God told the original authors to write particular Hebrew / Koine Greek words so many centuries later translators in one particular language only could create a perfect Bible?

  5. Kyle Loftis says:

    So much for 1611 KJV infallability

  6. Kyle Loftis says:
  7. Kyle Loftis says:
  8. Jason Edward Miller says:

    For salvation history to be English language centered could be considered ethnocentric in assumption. Confirmation bias?

  9. Robert David Van Meter says:

    I’ve never seen a KJVOnliest in the wild before. I wonder if he knows about the manuscript tradition that resulted in the KJV.

  10. Jessica Bueso says:

    Oh no! Not this guy! He has been kicked out of groups that I have been in before for his trolling for the NKJV “cult.”

  11. Will Kinney says:

    Jason Edward Miller posts: ” For salvation history to be English language centered could be considered ethnocentric in assumption. Confirmation bias?”

    Hi Jason. It is pretty amazing to see all the lame and poorly thought out arguments all the Bible agnostics and unbelievers in the inerrancy of ANY Bible you can show us come up with.

    There was a very long time in history when only ONE nation had the words of God. Was this also “ethnocentric”?

    Psalms 147:19-20.

    19 He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel.

    20 He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the Lord.

    English does happen to be the closest thing to a universal language today and has been for quite a while.

    You might try to actually READ the article all of you are ignoring and learn some historical facts. I mention several things about the English language in the article. Just a suggestion.

    Reasons Why The King James Bible Is The Absolute Standard – God’s Historic Witness to the Truth.

    https://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm

  12. Will Kinney says:

    Jessica Bueso says: “Oh no! Not this guy! He has been kicked out of groups that I have been in before for his trolling.”

    Hi Jessica. It is true that I have been kicked out of several groups but it is not for what you call “trolling”. The real reason people like you and others kick me out of their “Sola Scriptura” groups (and the Calvinists have been the absolute worse, even though I myself am a Calvinist) is because they do NOT want to face the FACT that they really do not believe that any Bible in any language they can show us is now or ever was the complete and inerrant words of God.

    And they usually are using the constantly changing Vatican supervised text versions like the ever changing ESV, NASB, NIV, etc.

    And to have these things pointed out to them makes them uncomfortable because most are just too dishonest to admit the FACT that they do not believe in the inerrancy of the Bible – any bible.

    Let’s demonstrate with you, OK? Can YOU be the first one here to actually answer the question?

    Here it is.

    Do you believe there IS (present tense) ANY Bible in ANY language, translated or untranslated, that you can SHOW US (Give us a link to where we can see it) that you honestly believe IS the complete and inerrant (infallible, 100% true) words of God? Yes or No?

    If Yes, which one
    is it?

    If No, or simply “I don’t know” are you honest enough to admit it.

    Thank you.

  13. Jessica Bueso says:

    You are very divisive. That is what I mean by trolling. I refuse to entertain/respond to the rest of your post. Have a blessed day.

  14. Martin Vandenhoven says:

    Only people who read KJV are saved!!? God can only work through the KJV!??

  15. Jairus Emmett says:

    As someone who supports using only the KJV in English, I find this as a weak argument to prove inspiration. There are so many more and better arguments to focus on.

  16. Marco Antonio Moreno Gutierrez says:

    ??‍♂️

  17. Michael Back says:

    Commenting is closed for this thread.

  18. Yosef Shum says:

    There’s no vowels in ancient hebrew so count again.

  19. Raymond Grignon says:

    I perceive you to be overly superstitious.

  20. Radziwill Tablada says:

    a pastor asked his congregation, “What’s the best translation of the Bible?”
    the answer: “your life”

  21. […] Feel free use or distribute any of these articles you… […]