Author

Is the antichrist as big a deal in end times prophecy as we make him out to be?

Discussion

31 comments

  1. Stacy Turbeville says:

    It doesn’t matter. It happened already.

  2. John Rolls Ewing says:

    what does that have to do with the antichrist ?

  3. Erik DuBois says:

    Read Daniel 11 the word “anti-christ” isn’t in there but the anti-Christ is very much described

  4. Melissa Nicole says:

    So hes not in Daniel. Does that mean he’s not a big deal?

  5. Isaiah Su says:

    Are you a Preterist, brother?

    If you disagree with these things, can you post your biblical belief /understanding. Just focus on these 5 points.

    Thanks and i appreciate your answer.

  6. Trevor Browning says:

    If you don’t believe that the term Antichrist is found in the Scriptures, you aren’t really reading the Bible.

  7. Christine Tina Edwards Chastain says:

    Why does this have to be so hard to understand. Is the Bible a puzzle? Did God not know there would be so many misinterpretations? Is the Bible only a book that intellectual people can understand, if so that seems unfair to the people who aren’t as intellectual as the rest? #willieverunderstand

  8. Harold Goldman says:

    The reason for different interpretations is because of scofields indoctrination of the darby theroy

  9. Andrew Westerhof says:

    It’s true, there is no rhyme or reason for the people of the prince in Daniel 9:26 to be some future antichrist who could not have had anything whatsoever to do with the destruction of the temple. The person being described must be Titus who was the actual prince of the people who destroyed the temple.

  10. Harold Goldman says:

    People don’t forget the desecration by the Syrians aka Hanukkah

  11. Seth Hart says:

    I’m doubtful there is one

  12. Scott Ross says:

    Nope….because there will not be one

  13. Blaine Corbyn says:

    Daniel 11:36-45

  14. Slaven Radic says:

    How can Daniel 12:11 be explained – Daniel 12:11 English Standard Version (ESV)

    11 And from the time that the regular burnt offering is taken away and the abomination that makes desolate is set up, there shall be 1,290 days.

  15. Harold Goldman says:

    Temple destroyed in 70 ad 3 1/2 years into the war . The war ended in 73 ad. At massad Jews new the Roman army was coming and did a mass suicide

  16. Trey Rodriguez says:

    Anti christ isn’t in Bible?

  17. Harold Goldman says:

    2 verses in 1 john and 2nd john he said they were already in the world

  18. Rex Ivan Loreto says:

    Premill flavor of interpretation

  19. Harold Goldman says:

    Unfortunately right rex

  20. Charles Meek says:

    Good post. If you want to study Daniel, here’s my Intro to Daniel article. If there is a gap between the 69th and 70th week it is the 40 years between the cross and destruction of the temple:

    https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AG7JvFPbD7KDoKE&cid=D3BD424B0B25B83F&id=D3BD424B0B25B83F%2116753&parId=D3BD424B0B25B83F%21113&o=OneUp

  21. Roxta Gibbons says:

    This is a misinterpretation

  22. Adam Franklin says:

    Very wise

  23. Mark Fonner says:

    Jake Evans, question. Are you talking about AN AntiChrist or THE AntiChrist? There is a difference.

  24. Alan Parsons says:

    the antichrist is mentioned indeed, Usually pays to read the bible before making these kinds of posts

  25. Kate Marie Wendi says:

    Actually two unmentioned intervals.

  26. Germo Juanites Tomtom says:

    Preterism

  27. Aaron Paul Carruth says:

    Dangit i keep forgetting to look into the Lucifer thing lol

  28. Steve Losee says:

    you also won’t find a 400 year gap between Testaments…but it’s there.

  29. John Marquis says:

    Isn’t that more of an eschatology debate than an apologetics debate?!

  30. Michael Burris says:

    how can I repost this?

  31. Michael Burris says:

    Although the statements are correct about Daniel, the releasing of antichrist is scriptural