Author

Ever hear of this fun controversy?

Wanna defend yourself faith, you’ve gotta be able to defend your text’s history.

Discussion

8 comments

  1. Reggie Lee says:

    KJV only doesn’t mean KVJ only. It means scripture based on Manuscripts from Antioch, not Alexandria…

  2. Will Hess says:

    There’s the rest currently. Going to have a lot more

  3. W Charles Brown says:

    Do you really want to read the correct Bible? Then learn Hebrew and Greek and then peruse the 8000 Greek manuscript copies of the New Testament and the 800 manuscript copies of the Hebrew Old Testament. Me? I will stick with my English translations thank you. Personally I prefer the NIV and the ESV Though I do refer to the KJV on occasion.

  4. Bob White says:

    Simply stated, any version that uses the terminology, “he who pisseth in the wall” to describe men and who uses very late manuscripts for the translation is not my first choice. There are also a couple of versions of the KJV and the original KJV included the apocrypha, so there’s that. If you want to use it, go for it, but to say all others that used earlier manuscripts from more original texts are from Satan is Cultic!