Author

Is the Bible Scientifically correct?

Discussion

51 comments

  1. Frankie Torres says:

    No, because the Bible is not a science book. It’s about redemption. For example, when Joshua told the sun to stop. That’s not scientifically correct because he didn’t had the knowledge we know today. He had no idea about it.

  2. Michelle Orr says:

    The Bible isn’t a science book. It isn’t a history book. It isn’t a book of poetry or song. It’s not a book like any other book.
    Where Scripture speaks, it is accurate.

  3. Reuben Modise says:

    The question is, is our scientific view Biblical

  4. Andy Gray says:

    No, because it doesn’t pretend to be a science book. It’s like asking if my daughters drawing of our house is mathematically correct. No it isn’t, because she’s not writing mathematics.

  5. Dane Davenport says:

    The Bible is the word of God. It is spiritual. Does science measure spiritual?

  6. Vivek Meshramkar says:

    Are s scientific books spiritually correct?

  7. Thianlal Vaiphei says:

    In humans discernment the answer is suited to be NO. But there may be something mentioned in the Bible proved to be correct by the scientists. If it is the case our limited knowledge is too small to cover the unlimited knowledge of God. Scientists are human beings having limited knowledge, this limited knowledge could not fathom all the dept of God’s attributes.

  8. Dale C. Aguilar says:

    The Bible is not base in science, it was science which is base in the Bible

  9. Paula Fuqua says:

    Yes. Sir Isaac Newton wrote complete exegesis of the Bible – more copy than all of his other works, and compare that to his work- Principia- the Bible of Physics. Newton believed in the Bible completely, and that gave him the foundation to write and discover the principles of physics

  10. Jereme McAlpin says:

    The Bible is not a science book but the scientific claims that it makes it makes are correct.

  11. J.R. Gilligan says:

    Yes. Former Geology buff here. Science confirms what the Bible says

  12. Ichthus Janz says:

    Or is modern Science Biblically correct?

  13. Ruth Grubaugh says:

    Yes

  14. James Zozzaro says:

    Every fact of science is explainable on a Biblical worldview. The Bible contradicts many scientific theories, but it accounts for all of the facts.

  15. Wendy Domino says:

    If there’s something in the Bible that seems to contradict science it means that we need to understand the science better. For example a lot of miracles make sense in light of things like quantum physics that a 19th century scientist wouldn’t have understood

  16. Simon Friis Larsen says:

    The Bible is the precondition for the intelligibility of science.

  17. Steve Losee says:

    It’s not a scientific textbook, but it’s always accurate.

  18. Steve Mercer says:

    The Bible explains what, not how. It doesn’t need to be scientifically correct because it has nothing to do with science. However the Bible is historically correct.

  19. Ramesh Nune says:

    The Bible is above science. Jesus birth is not scientifically explainable and many like that in the Bible. So the Bible is above human science..

  20. Drew Williamson says:

    Science is often wrong that’s why they keep changing it but God got it right from the beginning!

  21. Tom Salamone says:

    It is scientifically consistent. For instance, it gets the “days” of creation correct (that is the sequence of events are correct given the appropriate frame of reference from the surface of the earth).

  22. John Bennett says:

    The more we learn the more real science is coming in line with the Bible. Yes! Spend some time at creation.com.

  23. Joseph Leedy says:

    The Bible is totally correct, it has no errors!

  24. Tomas Toledo Herrera says:

    I respect each of your opinions, but the answer of this questions is: YES, The Bible is a Book scientifically correct to the 100 %, and I can proved. If let me to show you my friends it will be an amazing journey

  25. Tomas Toledo Herrera says:

    1)In the Bible says that God created the cosmos, the universe,the planets and all inside of it. God want us to grow in all science. Now check this: Historically speaking The Bible has proved itself that is correct.It is not necessary bein a scientific to write scientific facts, more if you are under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost.The Bible contains all the answers and why not the scientific related ones? The Bible says that God created the world with science. And I can show real proves , facts stablished in the Bible.

  26. Tomas Toledo Herrera says:

    There is an spiritual intelligence that has been lost and God wants to restore it.

  27. Jeremy Bickel says:

    Of course it is? God knows more about how His Universe runs than even creatures to whom He gave souls (that’s us). On top of that fact, the souls of every individual human (except Jesus) has been corrupted. Only saved people have souls that are capable of seeing clearly, and then only after some time fighting our bodies’ corruption to put it down under us, and then also with care, because our bodies are still corrupt and affect our souls! The science we do after we have our glorified bodies will be better. Praise God that He keeps us and does not require us to use our souls to get or to keep His life that He freely gives everyone who sincerely calls on the name of Master Jesus in belief that His death is effective to save; believing the Resurrection of Jesus will lead the saved toward righteousness (cleaner souls!).

  28. Gus Rodriguez says:

    I recommend this book.

  29. Bill Martone says:

    While the Bible is not intended to be a book about science, true scientific has never contradicted any statement found within its pages. Evolution is not “true science”, but science falsely so called. It is merely conjecture and theory.

  30. Dakota Ann says:

    How would it not be ?

  31. Timothy Vega says:

    Science simply means “knowledge”, as a word. “In whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” (Referring to Christ) Colossians 2:3. Ergo, anything that claims to be knowledge, aka science, that doesn’t proceed from Him as the foundation and source is Antichrist, not even knowledge. Science cannot prove the Bible. Rather, the Bible informs science. It speaks, and science observes and interprets according to the Scriptures.

  32. Art Ellingsen says:

    Whenever the Bible speaks about Science, it is correct. For example the Bible told us the Earth is round 800 years before Jesus was born in Isaiah chapter 40:22

  33. Timothy Vega says:

    The inherent danger is putting science in a position to prove the Bible. This puts science in the position of greater authority, which is backwards and wrong. God’s Word is a higher authority than man’s science, knowledge.

  34. Sedem Yaw Mensah says:

    Scientific? What has this “science” to authenticate The Bible for? What? It is rather the Bible that justifies /authenticates nature (God)on which science and technology (culture) was founded

  35. Joseph K O'Lear says:

    Some argue the Bible is not a science textbook, a history textbook, a philosophical textbook. That is, of course, all true. However, that is usually stated to limit the authority of scripture. We want to box it up so we can contain its’ impact on our life and culture. That is our depraved nature. It would be more accurate to say the Bible is not merely a science textbook, not merely a history textbook, not merely a philosophy textbook. Rather it stands in judgment of all of those lesser sources. Some, I among them, would argue that the Bible is the source of all truth because it is the only source of truth directly from God Himself. Some would cry out loud, “Hold it right there!” with arms flagellating
    with indigent academic protest, before they even understand what I am saying.
    Certainly, there are things that are true that are not in the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it say 2+2=4 in a base 10 system. While that specific is correct, in that it is both a true statement, and it does not appear in the Bible. However, it is only from the foundations of scripture that 2+2=4 in a base 10 system makes sense. Random chance over time cannot produce prescriptive information or even functional information. Only Shannon information.

  36. Glenn Buchanan says:

    Without a single flaw

  37. Lata Manuel says:

    Yes yes yes

  38. John E. Crisp says:

    Yes

  39. Cedrick Jones says:

    Science can locate the brain and Science can perform brain surgery. However, Science is still trying to locate and pinpoint exactly where the mind is. Additionally, Science can Not perform Mind Surgery.

    The Bible lets us know in Romans 12:2 that the Lord Jesus Christ performs mind surgery. The Good News: Jesus wants to give you a Mind Transplant, A renewed mind, Jesus wants you to have His Mind. This Surgery has 100% accuracy rate. ?

  40. Rick Stone says:

    Not a science book. But always accurate

  41. Margarita Romero says:

    There is no contradiction in it. Time and time again, the Bible has proven to be right in all aspects. Scientifically, it says the earth is a globe, the blood is the life source, each star is different, air has weight, the ocean floor contains deep valleys and mountains, etc… science back then didn’t believe this but after years, now it does.

    Although the Bible is not a science book, it’s infallible and from it is the absolute truth because it is inspired by God.

    2 Timothy 3:16

    “All scripture is inspired of God, is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”

  42. Smart Godwin says:

    The bible or the scripture was supernaturally breathed, and science is not.Science can only confirm the scripture not to prove it. How can science prove water turn wine? My son lived supernaturally with 25% of oxygen without medical support for 5yrs because of three holes in his heart at birth. How can science prove a miracle of a knew heart without heart trasmsplant,but all the above, science confirmed it and the medical doctor were shocked that turned my son a tourist centre.

  43. Jerry Buttrum says:

    Are the scientist incorrect or correct when they want to be. It’s much easier to just read the bible

  44. Tomas Toledo Herrera says:

    Science belonga to God He created everything with His wisdom, the word science means ” to know” , to know means ” knowledge” and knowledge means ” wisdom”

  45. Freddy Jocksand Diaz says:

    It’s not ment to be a book of science, but every claim, story and place has been proved by science to be true.
    Also when we are objective, we know that science is simply a collection of knowledge due to observation and trial. In this sense we know that science is limited. It changes as new discoveries are made. It cannot, will not explain everything. It hasn’t discovered the cure for.cancer, or Covid 19. So we must reject the idea that science and the Bible are in opposition, quite the contrary. Science proves the Bible.

  46. Joanie Appleseed says:

    Yes, if the science is correct.

  47. Mike Vincent says:

    It is correct in every aspect of life. The context is what is important to understand. After all God created “science” for us to learn more about Him and His creation, trusting in His “correct” Word is important.

  48. Yohana Javaid says:

    SCIENCE NEEDS BIBLE, BIBLE DOESN’T NEED IT. BIBLE IS 100%CORRECT BUT SCIENCE) SCIENTIFIC THEORIES) KEEPS CHANGING. MANY THEORIES WERE PRESENTED IN CERTAIN TIME PERIOD & WERE ACCEPTED RIGHT LATER NEW THEORIES PROVED THEM WRONG AND NEW THEORIES ARE MUTUALLY ACCEPTED.WHO KNOWS WHATS COMING AHEAD AS THE RESEARCH ADVANCES.

  49. Mark Jdin says:

    Just buy the evidence Bible it answers every question

  50. Dwight Osborne says:

    yes, He established the laws of science so science has to agree with His word. The problem with secular scientists is their interpretation of the data.