Is one way to argue for God’s existence better than…

Is one way to argue for God’s existence better than another? Should evidential and presuppositional case makers be divided based on their approach?

BTW, after watching today’s video you can vote for your preferred form of apologetics engagement in this poll:

[https://www.youtube.com/post/UgyvX5Kd23s0THC8Jlp4AaABCQ?fbclid=IwAR31CTEzQFVJPeinVaLljHjvSsIqj0PbndXdPACeB9n69m6DyvWh9i8iwKM](https://www.youtube.com/post/UgyvX5Kd23s0THC8Jlp4AaABCQ?fbclid=IwAR31CTEzQFVJPeinVaLljHjvSsIqj0PbndXdPACeB9n69m6DyvWh9i8iwKM)

Is one way to argue for God’s existence better than another? Should evidential and presuppositional case makers be divided based on their approach?