247 S.W.2d 63 (1952) CHURCH OF GOD et al. v. TOMLINSON CHURCH OF GOD et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. March 7, 1952. Attorney(s) appearing for the Case Mayfield & Mayfield, Cleveland, Harry J. Schaeffer, Chattanooga, for plaintiffs in error. Corn & Bell, Cleveland, Strang, Fletcher & Carriger, Chattanooga, for defendants in error. NEIL, Chief Justice. In 1927 the complainant, ... »
Dear Church, You and I have had a codependent relationship for a while, but I don’t blame you. I’ve used you to meet my selfish needs just as often as you’ve failed me. While others may talk about breaking it off with you, I refuse to. Despite the mutually destructive dance we often find ourselves in, I […] »
Can an international COG group rule for a resolution not yet allowed by the International Church of God assembly? This is a move to autonomous National Identity of the COG. »
Dale M. CoulterTo paraphrase Ecclesiastes, of the making of resolutions in the Church of God there seems to be no end (Ecc. 12:12). Normally, resolutions fall at the end of the agenda for the General Council, but we find a... »