Richard Dawkins thinks that faith is only present when there isn’t any evidence. This is rubbish. We must have faith in certain things for which there is evi…
Richard Dawkins thinks that faith is only present when there isn’t any evidence. This is rubbish. We must have faith in certain things for which there is evi…
Is it possible to have faith and be wrong?
If someone believes in a different religion based on faith are they correct also?
If two people have “faith,” in opposite things how would you determine who is correct?
Having faith in something, doesn’t make it true.
Having faith in something means you will believe something even if it is not true.
Of course it’s possible to have faith and be wrong.
The point of this video was not that having faith makes you right, it was that faith can be, and often is, based on evidence.
There are lots of people with faith that is not based on any particular evidence, but real faith almost always is.
Okay, please show me your best evidence.
Comments