Author

The thief on the cross argument- The argument is that the thief on the cross was not baptized and he was saved, therefore I do not need to be baptized in order to be saved.
1. this is silly. We do not know if he was baptized or not. that is an assumption based on no information of his history. Luke 23:42 shows that the thief knew something about the kingdom. That might mean that the thief could have been baptized by John the Baptist (Matt. 3)
1. There are some things today that we are privileged to that wasn’t available to the thief on the cross.

A. Christ had not died yet. Heb 9:16

B. Christ has not yet been buried Rom. 6:4

C. Christ had not yet been raised from the dead Rom. 10:9

D. Christ had not yet given the Great Commission Matt. 28:18-20

Im sorry but this is a bad example for not needing to be baptized as described in Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16; Acts 22:16;

Discussion

44 comments

  1. Kathy DeVoss says:

    John the Baptist was baptizing for the repentance of sin. Bsptism is not a component of salvation but an outward expression of inner conversion. You do not have to be baptized to be saved

  2. Stephen Valenta says:

    But it IS a good example of baptism doesn’t necessarily save you.

    What happens to someone if they believe the Gospel and repent and on their way to be baptized, they get in a car accident and die?

  3. Jerry Duckworth says:

    This is how I feel about Baptismal Regeneration and Works based Salvation

  4. Andy Witherall says:

    Please explain Ephesians 2:1-10, describing how baptismal regeneration fits into this passage, and also with central message of Colossians.

  5. Kathy DeVoss says:

    We beat a lot of dead horses

  6. Jojo Olmstead says:

    where is baptism to be saved in here ?
    Rom 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for ((salvation)) to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
    Rom 1:17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, “The righteous shall live by faith.”

  7. Stewart MacLeod says:

    Point 1 is laughable did they take him down, baptise him and stick him back up, get a grip. You can’t add baptism to salvation as that makes salvation a works based salvation and this makes what Jesus did on the cross meaningless, baptism is a sign of the covenant that is all.

  8. David Stacks says:

    This was over 2000 years ago and the topic is baptism. Today you will be with me in paradise.

  9. Teddeo Roque says:

    You are allowing your self to be baptized by the water because you are saved , because of your faith ,and not to be saved .

  10. Teddeo Roque says:

    As you said , I do not need to be baptized in order to be saved ,surely they do not say that , instead they say , I need to be baptized because I’m saved ,and they do it ,

  11. Jon Snider says:

    Batism is merely the 1st step of obedience.

  12. Prabal Shrestha says:

    1 Corinthians 12:13

    “For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.”

    Acts 1:5

    “…for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”

    Matthew 3:11

    “As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.

    Two kinds of Baptism, Holy Spirit’s Baptism and Water Baptism. Holy Spirit’s Baptism is necessary for salvation.

  13. Charles Mitchell says:

    So would you say no one was able to enter the kingdom of of heaven prior to Jesus resurrection? Moses? David? Adam?

  14. Jeff Gibson says:

    And what did Paul say about it?

  15. Ashley Moore says:

    Any true born again believer will follow Jesus and get baptized.

  16. Clive Samuels says:

    You get saved through faith in CHRIST. After you are saved however you will have a desire to get baptized.

  17. John Wolf says:

    Does it sound even the slightest bit reasonable, not to mention humane, for believers gathered around the thief’s cross, to remove him from the cross (an extremely painful process), baptize him in water, and then nail him back to the cross so his legs could be broken by the Roman centurion to expedite his death? You probably didn’t give it much thought. Just like your question.

  18. Mark Lincoln says:

    Or … could he (most certainly knew of Christ and been brought up in the Jewish laws, yet early foundation for Catholic in repentance?) for now knowing he was indeed with the Lord. And new without doubt that everything he thought he knew up to that point, with all the mistakes he’s made in life wanted to acknowledge Christ as our savior

  19. Rick Wing says:

    If baptism is a requirement for salvation, please sight in scripture where Jesus requires it.

  20. Shawn McComas says:

    John 3:16 …Who so ever believeth in him … and is baptized… ??‍♂️??‍♂️

  21. Kathy DeVoss says:

    John3:16-19 does no th contain the words and is baptized. I use NASB

  22. Michelle Borum Montgomery says:

    Jesus was baptized and He commanded us to be baptized. I wouldn’t take the chance of not doing it.

  23. Michelle Borum Montgomery says:

    Acts 2:38
    Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

    There are denominations that say when you are water baptized you receive forgiveness of sins and receive the Holy Spirit.

  24. Aroop Kumar says:

    Maybe. But baptism isn’t a requirement for salvation. Belief in Christ’s atoning work definitely is. If baptism is a requirement, it makes it a “work” for salvation. And that’s totally against the teaching of the NT. Eph 2:7-9

  25. Phillip Dow says:

    This is not a good rebuttal.

  26. K.D. Randolph says:

    Scripture refutes this.

  27. Madison Willoughby says:

    First, if the thief on the cross had been baptized prior to his crucifixion, why hadn’t his life changed in such a way that he shouldn’t have been on the cross? He admitted he deserved to be there, so why hadn’t his life reflected his salvation? Second, what he knew of the kingdom was what he’d heard either heard or seen from Jesus Himself, or about Jesus through word of mouth. When Christ hung on that cross the goodness within Him had to emanate from Him because even the Roman captain recognized Christ’s innocence and praised God because of it. It is reasonable to conclude the same happened for the thief. I would imagine hanging naked before a crowd of people while nailed to a cross, facing your mortality, would pull forth any humility remaining in a person. One thief found the humility to accept Jesus. The other didn’t.

    With regards to part 2 of your OP; since Jesus’ sacrifice goes back in time to cover those who died before He came to earth as a human (1 Peter 3:18-19) none of these considerations are important. Do you believe that God would deny the thief entrance to heaven after Jesus said he was saved? Since God and Jesus are one in the same, how would that work?

    Personally, I believe baptism is important. If it weren’t, Jesus wouldn’t have taken time out of His earthly ministry to example it for us. But since Jesus was already perfect He didn’t example it as a means unto salvation, but as a representation that He belonged to God (1 Peter 3:21 ‘figure or picture’ is defined as a representative). Baptism is an outward expression of an inward change. Jesus had no inward change because of His perfection, but He knew those who believed in Him would and would need to be identified as changed. The inward change of faith is what saves us, as countless scriptures tell, but baptism shows we belong to God, that we have a clean conscience before Him. The verse which speaks of the ark in 1 Peter 3:20-21 mentions the ark and being saved through water because Noah’s faith is what got him on the boat. The flood waters demonstrated, represented, that Noah’s conscience was clean before God. This is the very reason God chose Noah in the first place, that he alone was righteous among the vicious evil people of his day.

    The thief had the inward change necessary for salvation. He simply wasn’t able to be baptized.

  28. Ian Hartley says:

    He died first. I guess if you die before you can be Baptised that voids the requirement. The Salvation Army was a Powerful Evangelistic organisation when it started and General Booth considered Evangelism to be of more importance than Baptism so they did not consider Baptism as essential.

  29. Julius Quiam says:

    Plus Jesus has the power to forgive sins on earth. If Jesus said he will be in paradise…..I am not going to argue with that.

    1. How does anyone know that he hasn’t been BAPTISE with John baptism?
    2. He knew about the Kingdom and that’s what John was preaching.
    3. He knew that was Jesus and He was innocent.

    You are right….this is a weak argument!! Amen.

  30. Dee Guest says:

    Erick Clemons Good thought. We always think of the thief as being unsaved, perhaps he was merely a backslidden believer who had erred.

  31. Micaiah Young says:

    There would have been no need for the thief to say remember me if baptism saved him there would have been no need at all! You can’t make that argument either

  32. Micaiah Young says:

    Watch this

  33. Toni Armstrong says:

    The thief on the cross is before the outpouring of the Spirit so he wouldn’t be in the first resurrection He is in the grave awaiting the resurrection from the dead and judgement

  34. Steven Wells says:

    Baptism for salvation no but for obedience and public declaration yes

  35. Shane Dulay says:

    Baptism isn’t necessary for salvation. It’s much like a public announcement. Like when couples wear rings to show they are married.

  36. Jeremy Bickel says:

    Acts 2:38 was Peter telling the nation of Israel what to do after realizing that they murdered their long-awaited Messiah. Similar to this is Acts 22:16, where Paul is told to be baptized. Look back a few verses at verse 12, “Ananias, a devout man according to the law”. A person who was devout according to the law told Paul to be baptized. It was simply their way and has nothing to do with salvation under the New Covenant, per se. Consider Mark 16:16 – “Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.” Notice that in the positive case, baptism is mentioned. Being baptized was normal in their culture. Verbal confession is similar to this for Gentiles. See the last part of the verse; in the negative case, not being baptized is not part of the curse. In both the positive and the negative formulation, however, belief is required. We are to verbally confess Master Jesus for salvation – not get baptized (Romans 10:9a & 10:10b). Baptism isn’t disallowed – we have freedom – especially if it means to you and those who witness it what it meant to the Jews of that day.

  37. Mark August says:

    Good post

  38. Isaiah Hess says:

    I’m sorry, Erick Clemens, but this is an example of Judaizer theology and poor hermeneutics.

    You need to repent of your accursed theology.

  39. Kathy DeVoss says:

    Why can’t we just take God at His word. If Jesus told the thief he would be in paradise then he is in paradise. What is all this pointless banter about was the thief baptized or a backslidden believer. Just take God at His word

  40. Grant Reedy says:

    In order to be baptised, (full immersion water baptism) it would actually be beneficial to know exactly what one is being purified of in the first place.

    Curse of the serpent ring any bells ? for anyone?
    Of course not as most have absolutely no idea what that even means, but here they are presenting arguments from ignorance none the less.

    Don’t know why Christ did things? Just follow and do exactly what Christ did in context of scriptures and we will call it faith rather than ignorance in not coming to the knowledge of God, as God requires all mankind to do so.

  41. Kathy DeVoss says:

    How about being redeemed from the curse of sin and death

  42. Toni Armstrong says:

    The baptism is a baptism of repentence which is what the thief did when he acknowledge Christ while on the cross

  43. […] The thief on the cross argument- The argument is that… […]